@RetSquid ““Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. . We cannot condone this shocking behavior by the IRS. ……… the taxpayers should be able to expect the same from the government in its enforcement and collection activities.” U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299. See also U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032; Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932.
To date, the IRS has not responded.
@yankdini99
I assume you have a point with your continual posting of this?
@yankdini99
He was not criminally liable because the jury didn’t believe it was ‘wilfull’.
@RetSquid Internal Revenue Code 34.1.1.5 (08-11-2004) Suits by Taxpayer Alleging Improper Acts by the IRS (2) Unauthorized Collection Actions. Taxpayers may bring suit for damages if an officer or employee of the Service recklessly or intentionally, or by reason of negligence, disregards any provision of the Code or any regulation thereunder in connection with any collection of tax. Section 7433.
@RetSquid United States v. Lloyd R. Long, No. CR-1-93-91 (U.S.D.C. E.D. Tenn. 10/15/1993)
@RetSquid RetSquid 28 USC 1346 – Sec. 1346. United States as? defendant : (1) Any civil action against the United States for the recovery of any internal-revenue tax alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected, or any penalty claimed to have been collected without authority or any sum alleged to have been excessive or in any manner wrongfully collected under the internal-revenue laws…..
@RetSquid I didn’t ‘understand’ instead I ‘overstood’ everything you wrote, that’s why I’m laughing at you.
@RetSquid here’s a case you’ve missed:
United States v. Lloyd R. Long, No. CR-1-93-91 (U.S.D.C. E.D. Tenn. 10/15/1993)
@yankdini99
Which word did you not understand?
@RetSquid lol…
@yankdini99
How is it giving the IRS the color of authority? They ALREADY HAVE authority to collect income tax and levy property if it is not paid.
@RetSquid 28 USC 1346 – Sec. 1346. United States as defendant 
(1) Any civil action against the United States for the recovery of any internal-revenue tax alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected, or any penalty claimed to have been collected without authority or any sum alleged to have been excessive or in any manner wrongfully collected under the internal-revenue laws…..
@RetSquid. the ‘bookkeeping mistake’ is erroneous that gives the IRS color of authority which eventually leads to coercion. C’mon you’re smarter than this
@yankdini99
You still have to prove an actual injury, not a bookkeeping mistake on your IMF that has caused no injury.
@yankdini99
You still don’t/can’t understand the 14th Amendment has nothing to do with the income tax, aside from ensuring all persons equal protection.
This video is still a lie.
@RetSquid This all relates to the 14th amendment, that I earlier referred to. In which you mistakenly believed that federal agents have sovereign immunity in all cases. But guess what, they don’t… lol Congress waived immunity in civil right tort claims. Now do me a favor and go read IRS publication 1660.
@RetSquid 28 USC 1346 – Sec. 1346. United States as defendant : (1) Any civil action against the United States for the recovery of any internal-revenue tax alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected, or any penalty claimed to have been collected without authority or any sum alleged to have been excessive or in any manner wrongfully collected under the internal-revenue laws…..
@RetSquid The United States government is immune from suit unless Congress has waived the government’s immunity The FTCA includes an important waiver of sovereign immunity in 28 USCS § 1346(b). It permits people and corporations injured by the actions of federal employees to bring suit in federal court.
This video is the bullet that kills the so called “illuminati” if everyone heard this about 10 years before 911 around when bush’s dad made the N.W.O. speach we may have run most of these bitches out of power! Divide and conquer is exactly what it is! This reminds me of the speak an ex KKK member was suppose to assassinate malcom X in jail instead they ended up getting along! because Malcom had the same plan as the Klan!!! BLACK NATIONALISM
@yankdini99
Did I say it? No, the Supreme Court did.
@RetSquid IRS Publication 1660, Collection Appeals Rights… Did you say something about due process?
@yankdini99
Actually, no they ARE just your opinion, you have not posted any laws to back up your claims.
“So far as the due process clause of the 5th Amendment is relied upon, it suffices to say that there is no basis for such reliance, since it is equally well settled that such clause is not a limitation upon the taxing power conferred upon Congress by the Constitution.”
Brushaber
@RetSquid why do you believe the IRS is GOD? No thing on Earth has the ultimate authority, ask Adolf Hitler, oh wait…..
@RetSquid first off, they’re facts. Second yes it does.. it’s call the 14th Amendment.
…….. nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
@yankdini99
Read: UNITED STATES v. RUTHERFORD 07 2312 07 2313
U.S. v.? Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032 confirms that the IRS did NOT violate his rights. Where is the entire case “Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932″? What was the IRS supposed to repond to?